Featured Posts

A New Day Things are finally slowing down at my day job. Let me say a quick "Whew!" The short version, if you haven't been following along, is that my department has undergone a radical change. What was for many...

Readmore

I Interupt My Slacking To bring you this important announcement: It is time once again to participate in the annual Day by Day Support Drive. Sam, Zed, Jan, and Damon have been showing up here at bRight&Early for years. Chris...

Readmore

Legoland Florida Legoland Florida, coming to Winter Haven late next year at the site of the former Cypress Gardens, held an open house yesterday. You can read about it at my Brick Blog.

Readmore

About Independence Day The celebration of Independence Day spills over, for most, to today. Let me start by quoting from the famous letter of John Adams to his wife, Abigail. But on the other Hand, the Delay of this Declaration...

Readmore

SC Gets It Yesterday's primary wins by Nikki Haley and Tim Scott in South Carolina may not change the party identification of their respective seats this fall, but they definitely will bring change. Haley beat...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

Two D’s Depart

Posted on : 06-01-2010 | By : Jim Lynch | In : Politics, Senate

Tags: , , , ,

0

A pair of Democratic Senators will not be running this fall.

North Dakota’s Byron Dorgan made the announcement yesterday.

North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan stunned fellow Democrats when he decided not to seek re-election this fall and swung open a race that Republicans are convinced will help the GOP dent the Democrats’ fragile majority in the Senate.

Today Connecticut’s Christopher Dodd will announce his retirement.

Trouble-plagued Connecticut Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, who has for months been considered the most vulnerable Senate incumbent seeking re-election this year, will announce Wednesday that he is ending his bid for a sixth six-year term, a Democratic source confirmed.

Dodd will make the announcement at a press conference at his home in Connecticut.

I guess this moves Harry Reid up to the “the most vulnerable Senate incumbent” spot. Unless he wants to join the departure parade.

Sphere: Related Content

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Fox?

Posted on : 30-05-2007 | By : Jim Lynch | In : 2008, The Left

Tags: , , , , ,

0

Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd, just to add two names to the list.

Democratic presidential candidates Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd will not participate in a Democratic debate co-sponsored by Fox News Channel this fall, joining their three top rivals in bypassing the event.

I guess they’re afraid that someone at FOX will huff and puff and ask them a real question.

Their decisions, acknowledged by campaign aides Wednesday, is sure to disappoint the Congressional Black Caucus, whose political education and leadership institute is Fox’s partner in the debate.

Better to disappoint the Congressional Black Caucus than to offend the tin-foil hat brigade.

But Richardson, the governor of New Mexico, and Dodd, a senator from Connecticut, have been under pressure to shun the debate from liberal groups who say Fox is biased against Democrats.

They join the distinguished trio of John (“just the poor kids who get sent to war“) Edwards, comrade Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama, who have already announced that they would not participate caved.

But Colorofchange.org, an organization of black online activists, and the liberal MoveOn.org have agitated against Fox with an Internet campaign that includes video excerpts of conservative Fox commentators. MoveOn this week initiated an e-mail campaign urging backers to call Biden’s campaign to demand he back out of the debate.

Wow. Just Wow.

Imagine the future. . .

President Hillary Obamwards announced today that from now on all questions for the president will have to be vetted by press secretary Michael Moore.

I’m going to have nightmares.

Sphere: Related Content

First Cup 02.07.07

Posted on : 07-02-2007 | By : Jim Lynch | In : 2008, Congress, First Cup, Iran, Iraq, Our Military, Politics, President Bush, Ridiculous Headlines, Surrender Monkeys, The Left

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0

First CupNancy Astor: “If I were your wife, I would put poison in your coffee.”
Sir Winston Churchill: “And if I were your husband, I would drink it.”

Perhaps I should have waited until later today and filed this as a Ridiculous Headline post. Here’s the AP/Yahoo! Headline:

Democrats seek tougher action on Iraq

Wouldn’t that be a great thing if the Dems wanted to get tougher? But wait. That’s not what they want at all.

Tired of waiting for an opportunity to try to stop the war in Iraq, some Democrats say they want to use legislation approving billions of dollars in war spending to insist that President Bush not send more troops.

Others want to use the spending measure to bring the troops home by a certain date.

“The longer we delay taking action, the greater the failure in Iraq and the larger the cost in American blood and treasure,” said Sen. Christopher Dodd, [D-Con-Job], who supports legislation that would cap the number of troops allowed in Iraq.

Why, that’s not being tougher. That’s Cut and Run v. 8.0 (codenamed Quagmire).

The headline should read, “Democrats seek tougher action on America

Sen. Barack Obama said he would push his legislation ordering troops out of Iraq by March 2008.

“This is not a symbolic vote,” Obama, [D-Clean], said of his proposal, which is backed by two House Democrats. “This is what I think has the best chance of bringing our troops home.”

Here’s an alternative you might want to try Senator, Victory has the best chance of bringing our troops home.

I’m convinced that the real aim is not Iraq, but rather 2008.

Sen. John Kerry, who drafted a similar proposal, said Congress’ actions will be watched carefully by voters headed to the polls in 2008.

“If the Congress is going to procrastinate, if they refuse to debate the most important issue of our time … then that is going to be clear issue in the context of ’08,” said Kerry, [D-MassHat]

It’s all about the nutroots base after all.

Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate have pledged to their rank-and-file that a vote on a nonbinding resolution opposing the troop buildup would merely be the first attempt to pressure Bush to shift course in the war. Other legislation will be binding, they said.

I’m not John Boehner’s biggest fan, but he has this exactly right.

“If you’re not for victory in Iraq, you’re for failure,” Boehner said. “The consequences of failure are immense. I think it destabilizes the entire Middle East, encourages Iran and on top of that it’s pretty clear that the terrorists will just follow us home.”

Wake me up when the Dems want to get tough on terror instead of America’s interests.

Sphere: Related Content

Playing 2008 for Laughs

Posted on : 22-07-2006 | By : Jim Lynch | In : 2008, Humor, The Left

Tags: , , , ,

0

For a while I was concerned about the 2006 and 2008 elections. The more I hear the left speak, the less worried I become. Perhaps it is my unique sense of humor (some say bizarre, some say off beat, some say warped. Take your pick) but I just find the things the left says totally funny. Take this story about potential 2008 Presidential candidate Christopher Dodd:

He [Dodd] went on to rouse the group with a speech that criticized the war in Iraq, called for a minimum wage increase, stressed the need for alternative fuels, declared education as the nation’s most important issue, promised to protect Social Security and pointed out problems in the health care system.

Dodd said people are “nauseated” by the country’s polarization under President Bush.

Maybe it’s just me, but those two paragraphs together are just funny. Don’t you need two polls to be polarizing?

But I really laughed when I read this paragraph:

Jacqulyn Mack, 36, of Sarasota said she likes New York Sen. Hillary Clinton but questions whether she can win the presidency and would love to see a run by former Vice President Al Gore, who lost the presidency in 2000 after Florida’s five-week recount gave Bush a 537-vote win.

She questions whether Hillary can win the presidency and would love to see a run by Al Gore? Al Gore was wide left when he lost and has fallen off the farthest left side of this warming world in the six years since.

Oh, please DemocRATS, please get Gore to run again. If laughter is the best medicine I won’t need Medicare.

Sphere: Related Content