Featured Posts

A New Day Things are finally slowing down at my day job. Let me say a quick "Whew!" The short version, if you haven't been following along, is that my department has undergone a radical change. What was for many...

Readmore

I Interupt My Slacking To bring you this important announcement: It is time once again to participate in the annual Day by Day Support Drive. Sam, Zed, Jan, and Damon have been showing up here at bRight&Early for years. Chris...

Readmore

Legoland Florida Legoland Florida, coming to Winter Haven late next year at the site of the former Cypress Gardens, held an open house yesterday. You can read about it at my Brick Blog.

Readmore

About Independence Day The celebration of Independence Day spills over, for most, to today. Let me start by quoting from the famous letter of John Adams to his wife, Abigail. But on the other Hand, the Delay of this Declaration...

Readmore

SC Gets It Yesterday's primary wins by Nikki Haley and Tim Scott in South Carolina may not change the party identification of their respective seats this fall, but they definitely will bring change. Haley beat...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

The job of the loyal opposition is to oppose

Posted on : 23-02-2009 | By : Jim Lynch | In : Conservative Politics, Reclaim Conservatism

Tags: ,

4

sixkeysI stated the other day that I wanted to examine the Six Keys to Turning Around The Republican Party suggested by John Hawkins. Today I’ll take a look at the first offering, The job of the loyal opposition is to oppose. Here is what John had to say:

The key to firing up the base, drawing the clear distinction with the Democrats, and for that matter, good governance, is loudly opposing bad bills at every opportunity. The GOP should never support bad legislation merely so it can claim to be “bi-partisan” or so it can say it “did something” at election time.

I’ve heard it said that you can compromise plans, but never compromise principles. Working from this basis takes us in two complimentary directions.

When there is agreement regarding an action to be taken it is reasonable to compromise over the path used to accomplish that action. An overly simplified real world example would be suggesting to a co-worker that you go to lunch at one o’clock. If they state that they are really hungry and want to go at twelve and you counter that you have a conference call at twelve, but that you should be ready by twelve thirty and they agree, you’ve reached a legitimate compromise. You were both in agreement about the principle of eating lunch. The rest, as they say, is details.

The flip side of this scenario is opposing any alternative just on the basis of who made the suggestion, a desire to wield power, or simple contrariness. That reasoning typically leads to one party being resentful for no legitimate reason. Taken to the extreme nothing gets done and no one is happy.

That being said, John’s point was that the job of the loyal opposition is to oppose. There is a case to be made for standing in strong opposition to issues that are contrary to deeply held principles. There is no virtue in adopting the “go along to get along” stance when doing so goes against what you truly believe.

Let’s go back to lunch with a somewhat silly example to make the point. You have a principled stand against eating at The Pig Trough, a local barbecue joint. Your opposition is rooted in your beliefs that cleanliness is a virtue in a restaurant, visible vermin are a turn-off, trichinosis is something to be avoided, and $19.95 is too much to pay for a pulled pork sandwich. Even if your co-worker’s favorite eatery is The Pig Trough this is not an opportunity for compromise.

How does this apply to turning around the Republican Party? I believe that standing in opposition to bad policy and bad legislation, even when that opposition is unsuccessful, is the right play to make in two primary ways.

Most importantly it is the right thing to do. When our party and it’s leaders take a stand on any issue it should be based on the principles and beliefs that advance what is best for both individuals and the country as a whole. When opposing some policy or piece of legislation it is vital that our opposition is rooted in principle. Being on the winning side is not victory if it is the wrong side.

An important corollary to opposition made on this basis is that the opportunity then exists to show the people and demonstrate the principles that define our opposition. I would argue that standing in opposition while offering neither an explanation or an alternative is no better than tacit support.

Finally, principled opposition creates a clear demarcation between our stands and those that we stand against. One recent and recurring criticism of the Republican Party is that we have become Dem-Lite. There is little reason to support a party that is nearly identical to the other party, just less so.

I welcome you to add your thoughts on this post. Next up — Stop conceding so many groups of voters.

Other posts in this series: Stop conceding so many groups of voters

Sphere: Related Content

1,234 views

Comments (4)

links from Technoratihave become Dem-Lite. There is little reason to support a party that is nearly identical to the other party, just less so. I welcome you to add your thoughts on this post. Next up — Stop conceding so many groups of voters. Cross posted frombRight & Early.

Bipartisanship is a pipe dream. When the two parties are diametrically opposed on the most basic issue, the role of government, there is no reason the Republicans should stand down. I admire the likes of John Boehner in his attempt to enlighten the House to the largest fleecing this country has ever seen. I admonish the mainstream media and the average American for being more concerned about who made the top twenty-four on American Idol. Conservative politicians need to put themselves “out there” by criticizing government meddling and talking tough about breaking away from the nanny state.

Who, besides the mainstream media and media-whore RINO’s like John McCain, has EVER felt that bi-partisanship is somehow a good thing?

The liberals are as passionate in their misguided socialist beliefs as I am in my conservative beliefs. I can guarantee that none of them want this Utopian concept of “bi-partisanship” any more than my conservative friends do on our side.
We believe in what we believe in on principle. We elect “representatives” to represent our set of beliefs, not to crumble and compromise. Frankly, the concept of bi-partisanship would constitute a one-party tyranny, with no opposition. Our founding fathers specifically set up “seperate but equal” branches of government in order that they would oppose each other and create “checks and balances,” not rubber stamp bad ideas. So, our system of government is based on opposition based on principles. We have two major parties because we have two opposing ideological belief systems. Republicans need to remember that the New York Times doesn’t vote them in or out of office, so attempting to curry favors from the Times won’t help their careers. Most of us who vote them in or out of office already despise (or at the very least, don’t trust) the mainstream media. Better to have Republican voters on your side than the mainstream media.

Kramer auto Pingback[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]