Featured Posts

Four Bells, Nancy Admiral Farragut Pelosi has a wonderful idea, "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged her colleagues to back a major overhaul of U.S. health care even if it threatens...

Read more...

Polling Conservative Bloggers On Gay Marriage, Impeachment,... John Hawkins recently polled right-of-center/conservative bloggers asking questions copied from a Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll. Here's why. The poll results were treated as suspect mainly because some...

Read more...

A New Day Today is going to be an adventure. If you are a regular reader you know that I don't talk a lot about my day job. While I do mention work occasionally, I seldom, if ever, mention the company I work...

Read more...

This is going to be so cool I guess I'm just a big kid, but I am so excited about Legoland coming to Florida. A front-loading tractor was positioned Thursday morning outside the Magnolia Mansion at Cypress Gardens. It wasn't there...

Read more...

New Poll - How will conservatives do in the mid-term... I have a new poll in the sidebar to the right. The question is: How will conservatives do in the 2010 Mid-terms? Vote, and add your comments here on this post. 2010 is here and, whatever your thoughts...

Read more...

  • Prev
  • Next

Kelo Endgame

Posted on : 06-06-2006 | By : Jim Lynch | In : Politics, SCOTUS

Tags: , ,

0

The City Council of New London, Connecticut has acted on the worst Supreme Court decision in recent history, taking it to it’s logic-defying conclusion and voting to evict the last two homeowners.

The City Council voted 5-2 in favor of eviction Monday. An attorney for the residents said they are considering continuing to fight.

“You are a disgrace to the city, the state and the nation,” one of the residents, Michael Cristofaro, told council members who voted to evict.

The city has been trying for a decade to redevelop the once-vibrant neighborhood at the point where the Thames River joins the sea. Seven homeowners challenged the city’s plans to seize the property and build a hotel, convention center and upscale condominiums, saying eminent domain can’t be used to make way for private development.

Every time I read about this story I struggle to understand how this makes any sense at all. It’s just wrong in so many ways. I was shocked by the SCOTUS decision, outraged by the actions of the council, and scared by the number of people who don’t see this as a problem.

At least one council member gets it.

However, Charles Frink, one of the two council members who voted against the plan, said supporters should admit their mistake.

“I can’t accept a possible reduction in taxes by having neighbors thrown out of their property,” he said. “This is morally abhorrent to me. I refuse to profit from my neighbor’s pain.”

And let’s not forget, as it happened to the residents of New London, it could happen to you.

UPDATE: Thanks to Michelle for the link, and for pointing to this detailed post at BizzyBlog.

Sphere: Related Content

240 views

Comments (0)

links from TechnoratiCristofaro singled out five of the seven council members who favor taking the property. “You are a disgrace to the city, the state and the nation,” he said. [IMG hands.jpg] Blog coverage: Bizzy BlogBright and Early Previous: Your home is not your castle Home matters: the day after Life, liberty and property Holding the homewreckers accountable